Why Her (2022) Episode 8

Category: Why Her? (2022)

Dear Dramacool users, you're watching Why Her (2022) Episode 8 with english subs.

Dramacool updates hourly and will always be the first drama site to release the latest episodes of Why Her? (2022). Please reload the page if any error appears.

Please scroll down to choose servers and episodes.

Standard ServerChoose this server
StreamtapeChoose this server
StreamsbChoose this server
DoodstreamChoose this server
XstreamCDNChoose this server

Why Her? (2022) full episodes

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

20 Comments to “Why Her (2022) Episode 8”

  4. I CANT WAIT FOR THE NEXT EPISODE!! i started watching this since yesterday n it already caught my attention ?? soo jae n chan r so cute together!! my heart can’t handle this LMAOO. next episode plss

    Reply

  7. seo hyun jin makes this series the best. even in the Beauty inside, she host her role like wow.. and here too.. i cant wait for the next episode to come out.

    Reply

  10. Plzzzz more of their crumbsss i needddd. I want a moment of them. Just then together only! And fkkkkkfkfk bae inhyuk! I luv him but why is he always the bad one??. Anyways rooting for chan and soo jae. Goddamn i luv her acting and her character.

    Reply

  13. Wait…..I’m actually the first to comment on this episode? Damn i feel blessed. But this episode makes the movie predictable. The baby she had is alive, there’s that possibility a Choi was involved in the rape case and hence why they wanted so much for Chan to take the fall, the professor and Chan will have a fall out after she finds out who he is….not to ruin the series….but this is just my POV.

    Reply

    2. This isn’t the penthouse and she was in the US, so I dont think the baby would be alive. Theres also no reason for Chairman to steal and get rid off a baby by paying doctors to diagnose it as a stillborn.

      Reply

      1. There is plenty of reasons why the Chairman would want to steal the baby but not get rid of it though, because if you’ve noticed the Chairman is a very dominant and protective father so he wouldn’t abandon his blood so recklessly.

        He has money, so bribing doctors in the US or anywhere really isn’t too difficult. However if you consider the timing of things that’s where it may be a bit dreary but it can be explained as such: When Oh Soo Jae was sent off to America, she wasn’t showing just yet. The chairman had told her that Choi Jun Wan would come later and they’d get married and have their child there. Months pass, Oh Soo Jae has the child probably by C-section without her being conscious and wakes up to the news that her baby was still born. When she calls Choi Jun Wan, she discovers that she’s actually been abandoned and the Chairman had already arranged a marriage for his son. (THIS IS WHERE IT GETS CONFUSING) If he was married on the same day as the baby was born, was his bride already pregnant? But that would be unlikely considering Korean custom regarding marriage. So the only explanation would be, the Chairman has Oh Soo Jae’s daughter raised abroad in secret and when Jun Wan and his wife actually have their child but she has a still birth. They replace the stillborn child with Oh Soo Jae’s kid and no one would question the age because the couple lived abroad for many years. That is my analysis.

        Reply

        1. Wthhhh this looks so accurate and making sense. When i first saw the child and soo jae i knida had that feeling.

          Reply

    3. Oh my …………. its going to get hard during the episodes when she figures out who he is …..but then again i hope shell be able to believe him the way she did during his trial……..and its definate that the Choi’s had something to do with the rape case Chan was accused of ……….. the twists here really are facinating

      Reply

    4. i have a feeling that soo jae would be happy that chan has come to a good place and is living somehow without being trapped in his past. this is just my opinion although i hope it comes true.

      Reply